Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (VII of 1967), the suit for the declaration of section 39 suit of the plaintiff was dismissed by trial, but the same was ruled by the appellate court in favor of the plaintiff's registration of defamation. It was alleged that the plaintiff claimed that the defendants had fraudulently and illegally entered suit in their favor and that the plaintiff had never gifted them the property of the suit. Waldetti defendant denied gift facts The plaintiff alleged to have inherited through the plaintiff. The identified mutation of the suit land in their favor, however, no expert witness was present who testified that such fingerprints were affixed by the plaintiff, only in their names for the mutation. The defendants were not given any property rights by which it was not established. Reliable evidence is not a record of income, by its own power, sufficient to prove the truth of this transaction, unless its authenticity is proved otherwise such documents are a part of the public record. For that reason, they were admissible in evidence, but they did not, by their power, prove the fact of their relationship and the execution of them, they were covered by an independent and credible source. He had a family, therefore, he had no clear reason to give the property in favor of his brothers (defendants) to the appellate court's decision Was also excluded from the illegal action
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
