Find a Lawyer

JAVED AHMAD ALIAS JAVED IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE

Section 5 Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Rehabilitation Allowance and Dwyer Reinstatement was decided simultaneously Husband (applicant) said that the amount of restitution allowance was irrelevant because of its social status. Accordingly, the appeal court was already reduced. Considering the social status of the husband, the amount of care allowance likewise makes it cheaper. The husband is obliged to maintain his wife and children and since this marriage is still intact, payment for maintenance allowance is in the way. There may have been no illegal interference between the parties in the court orders below the constitutional petition.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF alias KALA v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1346
• DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 2013 YLR 1348
• ARIF ALI v. FARZAND BIBI 2013 YLR 1354
• BASHIRAN BIBI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, KOT SABZAL 2013 MLD 1359
• FAKHAR IMAM v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2013 PLC(CS) 1369
• MUHAMMAD JAMEEL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1369
• Dr. MUHAMMAD JAVED ARIF v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2013 PLC(CS) 1372
• Syed MUHAMMAD ABBAS SHAH v. RETURNING OFFICER 2013 CLC 1374

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes