MST. ANAR MAMANA versus MISAL GUL
Section 5 and the schedule suit for the care of the plaintiff's wife and Plea was that the plaintiff had left her home on her own contract, she was not entitled to rehabilitation, in the year 2000 the parents' house was sent to a jirga. Before the plaintiff filed a lawsuit during that period, he had failed to visit his home or provide care to the plaintiff, who had no alternative, but he had left his home. The plaintiff's request was abandoned and the wife's parents go home and the plaintiffs' case was decided in the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Astore lawyer
