Find a Lawyer

GATRON (INDUSTRIES) LTD. versus BALOCHISTAN EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Section 45, 57, 58 and 62 Complaints for Payment / Compensation for Workers' Remedies Appellant's Company Appellant's claim was that his workers were waiting for a bus to their homes under a tree outside the factory after performing their duties. Gate, a taxi, injured the fleeing laborers and said the injured workers had to be hospitalized, due to lack of facilities at the institute and that the appellant company had to spend large sums on medical expenses, The appellant demanded repayment / compensation. He said that the appellant's claim was rejected by the Commissioner Social Security, the appellant filed an appeal against the Commissioner's Social Security decision on the basis that the appellant's claim was denied on the basis that the work of the injured workers was denied. Was out of place and not in the factory accuracy premises. Accident came under the definition of accidents provided under Provincial Employees \ Social Security O. Ordinance, 1965, and the theory of ideological expansion was largely applicable because workers were certainly waiting for a place to reach their jobs while the factory Injured workers outside were certainly not entitled to free and unlicensed private activity Get their compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act The employer admittedly had only a dispensary that had no hospital or medical officer or professional doctor. Was not present as required by section 45 (1) (b) of the Provincial Employees \ Social Security Ordinance 1965 Provided under the said facilities and injured workers were taken to hospitals. The matter was reported to Social Security. criminal advocate from Kakul lawyer