Find a Lawyer

NOORAB KHAN versus STATE

The testimony of the investigating officer in the testimony of Section 9 (c) prosecutor's officer stated that the accused held a black bag containing four handguns while the other witness of the prosecution opposed it. The suspect had tied the chassis to his feet with plastic tape and it was hidden. Both witnesses acknowledged that the recovery site was inaccessible and was readily available to the public for investigation, but no attempt was made by police officers to link anyone to a public investigating officer, Consultant not prepared at restoration. On that occasion, Chars was told in the form of two slabs wrapped in black plastic, and the separation and stamping of the specimen on the spot was not mentioned in the statement of the investigating officer under section 161, CCP. The four slabs in the bag were told to contain two slabs, but samples for the examination were not obtained from each slab. The samples obtained from each slab raised serious doubt on the prosecution's case, the accused being the beneficiary. Will go to It was sent to the forensic science laboratory 72 hours after the restoration of the recovered samples. Such unnecessary delays in sending samples can be considered a material situation. The prosecution's case was not only suspicious, given the suspect's overall facts and the circumstances of the case, but the apparent delay in sending samples to the forensic science laboratory created further suspicion in the prosecutor's case, raising the suspect's benefit, The sentence and the sentence were set aside. And he was acquitted of the charge law firms from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer