Find a Lawyer

RIZWANULLAH versus STATE

Articles 4 324 and 34 34 Definition of Proof The case against the accused was not definitive proof and the trial court failed to apply its judicial mind to the facts of the case in which the court proceeded in the trial. There was a violation of the principles of safe management. The complainant told in the trial that when he arrived on the spot, he was shot in the back due to injuries and lost consciousness, the complainant also admitted that he was fired from behind and the accused. Did not see him firing at him. The prosecution's witnesses escaped from the trial court's notice of their claim to be with the complainant and the incident was viewed as a host of circumstances. The witness stated that the defendant was involved in a false indictment of the accused. The witness was certainly not present at the scene and did not see any incident, and it was reported that I received the incident and took his injured brother to the hospital where the FIR was delayed. The details were not explained and the possibility of consultation cannot be excluded, in cases when the incident occurred in a densely populated area during the daylight, but as a proof of the prosecutor's story. No independent and unwanted witness was presented from the complainant's cousin who said that at the crucial time, the complaining party I was not being treated as a witness that the accused received injuries as a result of which reached the crux of the prosecution case. Cross-fire between complainant and fugitive partner property advocates from Sukkur lawyer