Section 2 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad's definition of evidence was similar to the accusation that the accused had a similar role to the accused, which the acquittal partner denied, the allegations could not be ascertained. The independent details of the material, allegedly by the prosecution, did not appeal the litigation and the story of the defendant as alleged by the prosecutor was not credible, even to the extent of the motive. The suspect's case was not related to the acquittal partner's case 4 days after the alleged arrest of the alleged pistol 30 bore identified He was recovered, while 13 days after the suspect's arrest was submitted to the Franzic Science Laboratory office. At the trial of the accused against the accused described in the FCR story, it was not appropriate to rely on the recovery of the pistol and the alleged recovery of the forensic science laboratory by the accused. went. The case of the accused was contradicted by the medical evidence, in which case, his case was not substantiated. The accused had no confirmation of the alleged prosecution case. The accused's appeal was not accepted. By giving him the benefit of the doubt. His punishment and punishment were set aside and he was acquitted and released.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
