OVI, R 17 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suitcope Plaintiff Accusing herself of being the original owner of the suit property in order to amend the lawsuit, and his ex-wife being a plaintiff The initial request was made in a written statement that she had purchased the suit property from her pocket, working in the preparation of the molecular evidence through a court appearance for the presentation of her documentary evidence, and that Omar Burke, the killer, was working on the farm. Plaintiff's Request for Modification of Written Statement by Changing the Name and Style of the Rabia Sewing School Plaintiff's Request Even the words of a sewing school owned by him were that if the proposed amendment, if allowed, would amount to a new defense, which was not lawful. He purchased the suit property out of his pocket The proposed amendment to Defendant's income source will not change the nature of his PP Lea Plaintiff has yet to add evidence that the proposed amendment will not present a prejudice case. Such request was accepted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
