I.T.AS. NOS. 3139/LB AND 3267/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 14TH JANUARY, 2004. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 3139/LB AND 3267/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 14TH JANUARY, 2004.
Section 13 (1) (d) and 65 Income-tax Rules, 1982, R207 On the basis of the parallel case, the addition of a parallel case was made on the basis of a parallel case. There was no record of doubt. Prove that more and more cases of registration were registered by the Appellant / Assistive Value Editing Officer at the time of the buyer's sale and there was a partial reduction in the phase of its first appeal. Was not located. It was not subject to any legal permission under section 13 (1) (d) and was an offense in the eyes of the law and was removed by the appellate tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
