Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.4680/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 30TH DECEMBER, 2003. versus I.T.A. NO.4680/LB OF 2003, DECIDED ON 30TH DECEMBER, 2003.

Section 59 (1) and 50 (7E) Self-Assessment of CBR Circular No. 11, 1997 was purchased with its 29 electrical connection meters during demolition of old structure and construction of new building. These 29 electrical contacts were retained by paying monthly bills in the premises as well as assisting with the tax deduction, the officer examining the monthly bills paid excluded the withdrawal from the Self Assessment Scheme on the basis that Section 50 of the Income Tax Ordinance (7E), with the deduction of taxes, the electricity bill, 1979 was illegally claimed because these payments were fraudulent and tax deductible. The small payment was not widely accepted for acceptance of return under the Self Assessment Scheme, before the appellate authority affirmed the action of the Assessing Officer, saying that there was no documentary evidence regarding the electricity meters. The smallest tax payment was made when the assessment was made under section 50 (7E) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, denying the benefit of tax deduction, without the use of the authority for any reason, it is the duty of the concerned assessing officer to pay the tax. Prior to refusing credit for, the Department should get all the information from the Electricity. The First Appellate Authority of the deduction completely failed to fulfill its duty because it refused to take advantage of the tax deduction but also on the action of the diagnostic officer. Failed to comment and loan claim method for tax deduction under section 50 (7E) How is. ) The Income Tax Ordinance 1979 can be considered illegal and factually incorrect, which the Assessing Officer's First Appellate Authority has failed to acknowledge. divorce advocates from Panjan Kisan lawyer