Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 821/IB TO 823/IB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2003. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 821/IB TO 823/IB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2003.

Sections 52 and 86 are the liability of persons who have failed to pay or pay tax deductions, which were considered taxable tax under section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which is neglected to make such purchase. Less than Rs 25,000 from each party. Previously the Appellate Authority Department requested that the SCC not enter details or were not verifiable, the department was unable to identify any clause of the law under which the Assigning Officer may request information related to it. ? In one instance where the payment to a party had exceeded Rs 25,000, such assumptions were applied and read section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and other related sections such as the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Severe and unusual burden on taxpayers or on someone who was not receiving income under which they were taxed. Provisions: Many specific individuals were given the responsibility to deduct tax at the time of payment. And then submit it to the state treasury with specific information and then the recipient of the tax will not have any benefit from receiving the taxes, burdened with various responsibilities if he fails to deduct tax or collect tax. If he goes, he becomes responsible for paying such tax and not filing or paying tax. Additional taxes and penalties were incurred even if they did not submit various statements. Before carrying the burden on the person, proceed strictly according to the law which may or may not be required to be deducted or which may be defaulted in such duties or the Department shall best law firms from Skardu lawyer