MAHBOOB HUSSAIN MALIK versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE
Non-compliance with Section 9 (b) Constitution of Pakistan Article 199 Constitutional petition for non-payment of penalties by the landlord under Section 9 (b) of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009, effective against the judgment of the trial court. The petitioner is pending before the Appellate Court for the respondents (landlord) such removal was filed by the respondent (the landlord) without complying with Section 9 of the Punjab Rated Premises Act 2009, and the appellant. Appellant Court Applicant Submits Compensation Under Section 9 (b) of the Act Was allowed, the applicant accepted the order of the Appellate Court on the grounds that if the landlord does not collect a fine time to make the withdrawal request, can not afford any mistakes. It was not fatal to pay the penalty for failure to submit the required fine at the time of filing the removal or removal of the property applicant, but could be resolved by the landlord if he It was unacceptable to allow the respondent (the landlord) to pay the required fine in such a case in the context of the case, after the trial was submitted later. Rules found in invalid order, constitutional petition deleted \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
