Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAHID AND OTHERS versus THE STATE

Section 2 30b (b) / 34, ?? // evidencere and 4 364 testimonies of testimony were reported to the police two days later when the prosecution witnesses subsequently filed a case for false involvement. So the ocular account in the case was incompatible. Medical evidence allegedly extra-judicial confession of the police by the accused was not credible in connection with the crime. And did not take advantage of his weakness. The defendant's murder was a blind murder and there was no evidence of a case against the accused. Only the evidence that comes from unforgivable sources can be convicted or retained. The accused was acquitted under circumstances. patent advocate from Rangoo lawyer