Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR HAYAT- versus THE STATE

Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, the Superintendent of the accused in jail denied the charge when he was inspected by the Sessions Judge and his visit was excessive. On the day of the incident, knowledge of the accused's departure was spoken out against him; seven witnesses, including the jail doctor, the head warder and the accused in the jail at the time, were involved in the complaint, in particular. It was alleged in the FIR that the incident occurred due to the active involvement of the jail authorities, because in his absence the arms could not be accessed inside the jail, killing four judicial officers. Was, no, under the imagination of Section 322, PPC covered. Certainly affected by the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), CCP Bell was denied the circumstances criminal advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer