AHMAD KHAN versus KHADIM HUSSAIN
The appellate court's evidence for the trial of section 13 & pre 13 cases, after examining the evidence on record, came to the conclusion that the plaintiff had failed to prove the defendant's motive, the appellant's testimony about the testimony of the defendant The contradiction was reviewed in court. Contradictions were found in the testimony of the plaintiff's affirmative judgment in the trial under which the decision of the case filed by the plaintiff was set aside, the appellate court set aside the facts and contradicted the testimony of the plaintiff's witness. Was unable to Advertising of any jurisdictional error or legal infringement in the appellate court's decision and decision and the appellate court's order shall not require the intervention of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Shahdad Pur lawyer
