Find a Lawyer

RAO MATLOOB HUSSAIN AND OTHERS versus D. P.O. AND OTHERS

Sections 353, 427, 148, 149, 186 and 506 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 6 (2) (m) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 transfer of the case from the constitutional petition The criminal court has a charge of legalizing the Anti-Terrorism Court that they had no weapon in their hands but used only abusive glitches that attracted the provisions of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Cannot be considered serious. The complainant was outraged when he tried to advise them, all the efforts described in the FIR were reported as an attempt only when there was no serious repression or intimidation of a civil servant at the time of the incident. According to the contents of the FIR famous supreme court advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer