TARIQ MASIH versus THE STATE
Articles 10 (b) and 16 define the evidence as the female accused, who was a Christian after converting to Islam, was no longer the legally married wife of the complainant, who had the origins of Christian marital relations between the accused and the complainant. She had the freedom to marry her partner, who had converted to Islam, as well as to follow religion. In Islam, the nature of the marriage contract is between a man and a woman, in which it was not necessary to prepare any formal practice according to Sharia. That a valid marriage had come into existence but immediately the marriage was also available on record on the evidence of the accused's marriage. This offense was not admissible in law, thus, was committed by the accused, the accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Noorpur nooranga lawyer
