MUHAMMAD INAYAT ALIAS INAYATOO versus THE STATE
Section 12 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the definition of Section 377, the FIR was all immediately filed with the victim even though he was the only witness who withdrew the commission of corruption with him, but on record. Nothing was brought in to show that there was any enmity between the complainant and anyone. There was no reason to doubt the testimony of the complainant, the victim, and the prosecutor's witness between the accused or the victim and the accused or their family. It was suggested to the victim that in fact someone else accompanied him. And the accused was in fact involved. Although he was there, it was loudly denied, but nevertheless, it would not move the defense case because the victim's statement was proven in the presence of the accused at the time the crime was committed with the victim. Air, Medical Evidence and Chemical Examiner's Report
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Diamer lawyer
