Find a Lawyer

MST. NAHEED AKHTAR versus AMJAD MAHMOOD AKHTAR

S. 497, Crimes of Gaddafi (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance (VIII of 1979) Sections 7 and 11 of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD bail, the grant was verified against the order of the trial court under which the accused Bail was granted for the reason. The main issue with the trial court in approving the accused's bail was that since the FIR was registered under section 7 of the Crimes (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance, 1971, it has yet to be settled. Could not be made whether the matter was covered under section 7 or would come under it. The trial court found in section 11 of the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Limitation) Ordinance, 1979 that it was a matter of further investigation; the prohibited clause of section 497, CR PC was not attracted to section 7 of the crime of crime. Was. The ordinance, 1979, did not provide for the use of any other type of punishment, in which the sentence of imprisonment, in addition to the stripe sentence, was to release the accused under trial at trial. Because even if it is possible that a case under section 11 of the said ordinance is likely to be held, detaining the accused would not be prudent as the sentence cannot be justified in the expectation that, under the circumstances, the exemption on bail will be withheld. Would have been tough. Because the accused were charged under Section 7 of the Qazf (Enforcement Head) Ordinance 1979, if they were eventually convicted, then they could be sentenced to the maximum sentence and the imprisonment was dismissed. How the accused would be imprisoned during the trial, if they were prepared to bail their case, then review the judgment against the decision, dismissed after the trial court misunderstood. immigration advocates email from Kohlu lawyer