KHALID MEHMOOD versus THE STATE
Sections 12 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), provisions of Section 377 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 367 of 366, the CCPC sought after the trial to file the case or to evaluate the evidence of the prosecution. Without setting up, trial. Such defect not only violated the essential provisions of the law contained in Section 367, CR PC, not only in defining the evidence and defining the defective evidence, but also in ignoring the prescribed rules of the administration of criminal justice. Gives Unless the prosecution's conviction in the trial was to eliminate the guilt of the accused, there was no need to look for defense evidence, so that he could be convicted on the basis of weakness in his defense. Talk. The result was set aside and the case was referred to the trial court for written judgment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Dhirkot lawyer
