SAHARA TRADING INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. versus BANK ALFALAH LTD.
Sections 10 and 9 (5) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the suit defending the suit defaulter company did not apply for leave to defend the case, but the garnet was granted leave And applied for defense of suit banking. The judge refused to grant relief to the bailiff in the premises that no clear dispute was identified and no credible explanation was presented, and the petition for defense and defense of the case was dismissed. As a result, the decision to prosecute was decided in favor of the case. The bank and the defaulter company and the banking judge's bail order were affirmed by the high court of the defaulter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Bhuawana lawyer
