Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus SARFRAZ

Sections 4 and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) the right to self-determination, the use of the lease of the suit land when the sale of the suit was sold, the preterite was the king and the co-owner of the suit land was not the court. The importer in advance was not found to be entitled to exercise voting and the case was rejected. A leaseholder is found all over the country; he cannot be allowed to say that he, as a tenant, has a pre-emptive right to self-determination. The decision of the suit land by the High Court is not a fact or There was no legal weakness that the record decision was not mistaken or misread, based on accurate, careful and accurate definition of the admissible evidence contained on the record. It did not guarantee any interference in the exercise of discretion, by which the Supreme Court's leave to appeal was denied. top advocate from Rashidabad lawyer