NAVEED QUAMBER versus M. BASHIR KAYANI
Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff's complaint was that the plaintiff in the interest of the defendants had received the amount of consideration and the plaintiff who occupied the suit land claimed that he The owner of this suitland. And in the interest of the defendants, after the death of the predecessor, it was their legal obligation to transfer all the property in the interest of their forefathers to the interest that was raised by the defendants in the transaction and the plaintiffs' foreclosure. Total was not about ownership. Only the owners of the land that had already been transferred to them, the trial court dismissed the case but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the case was pronounced and the order passed by the appellate court. The document was retained by the High Court under the jurisdiction to review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Domeli lawyer