Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAVEED QUAMBER versus M. BASHIR KAYANI


Article 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff's complaint was that the plaintiff in the interest of the defendants had received the amount of consideration and the plaintiff who occupied the suit land claimed that he The owner of this suitland. And in the interest of the defendants, after the death of the predecessor, it was their legal obligation to transfer all the property in the interest of their forefathers to the interest that was raised by the defendants in the transaction and the plaintiffs' foreclosure. Total was not about ownership. Only the owners of the land that had already been transferred to them, the trial court dismissed the case but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the case was pronounced and the order passed by the appellate court. The document was retained by the High Court under the jurisdiction to review.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.