MST. MOODAN versus SAIFULLAH
The unlawful delay in filing the FIR was fatal in the absence of any plausible explanation in the appeal against the breach of Article 292 (b) / & 34 & 8 458 / Constitution34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). The names of the male witnesses were not mentioned, in the relevant column of the Medico Legal Report, the ocular account did not receive medical evidence, no electric bulb was shown in the FIR or in the site plan, One crime was not cleared, no fire expert report was released. There was no reasonable basis for interfering with the defendant's conduct in the formation of any other evidence on the basis of the record evidence which was based on which the adverse leave to appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from FR Kohat lawyer
