MUHAMMAD MALIK versus MANSOOR SIDDIQUE
Article 54 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Article 115 and AXXI, R 32 Decree for Dismissal Pursuant to the suit for a permanent injunction, the courts ruled in favor of the defendants and the defendants were given no Was also prevented from building in any way. The plaintiff's part, and they were also barred from transferring that particular part to another person, the defendants, in contravention of the terms of the decree, transferred certain part of the land to other persons and to the same plaintiff. A construction application was filed, but both of the following courts simultaneously rejected the same justification. The two courts below misunderstood the provisions of OXXI, R 32, CPC and the orders were upheld in violation of the principles laid down by the High Courts of the High Courts. And accordingly a request for a judgment of merit was sent to the Executive Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer