MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus THE STATE
Section 497 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of Adultery (VII of 1979), Section 10 (2) / 13/14 bail, raided by local police on the pretext of apprehending the accused, the raiding party failed to catch. He said he was guilty, but found the accused involved in adultery with different women. The High Court was treated as such by the police. The accused women involved in the case were never examined and the aforementioned women have never been arrested by the Chemical Examiner for the seizure of the vagina. The office was dispatched to establish a commission for adultery by them, investigations into the matter had already been completed and a challan was also presented in the physical custody of the accused. In the circumstances, there was no further need for interrogation. The accused, under the circumstances, was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Khoski lawyer
