AMMARA HASNAIN versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN
Regulin: 13 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request The MBA section rejected the application by the applicant for re-review of pharmacology paper on the basis that the respondent's book Was just reviewed for review. The applicant was that the unacceptable order passed by the respondents under Rule 23 (b) was illegal and unconfirmed by law, reviewing the University's original Response Word and Order by the High Court. No irregularities were detected and verified by. Under the University's Discretionary Principle, its remarks were only available in extraordinary cases, for the reason that a strong foundation must exist for its written applicant and a genuine response book. Not estimated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
