Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF SINDHU versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE

Reglin 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Re-examining the Educational Institution Answer Book / Candidate who appeared in the first annual examination of the FEL, 1991, papers I and IV candidates once again in the supplementary examination. In the two articles that appeared, Banger cleared Paper IV and was declared unsuccessful on a request by a candidate in the Vice-Chancellor of Paper I, working under Regln 23 of the PU University Calendar, 1990 by a professor. Asked the candidate to re-review the professor's response book, the candidate got the number 40, at least After more than 8 months in the numbers required have been the vice chancellor said in the paper to the principal again, re-examine the response of the candidate from Law College, which was previously reviewed. On the evaluation of the second number, 38 marks were found eligible, the Vice-Chancellor based on the evaluation of the second, found that on average, in the two studies, the candidate was entitled to the number 39 and in the circumstances the candidate mentioned through a paper record. I was unsuccessful, had not previously been examined by a professor in which the candidate was entitled to number 40 in the relevant paper. Accepted or rejected by the Vice Chancellor's reassessment order which was rejected by the professor, university authorities, could not be re-evaluated directly by any other professor, for the first time in more than 8 months of diagnosis. Later, another diagnosis was made by another examiner, according to the first check, not a valid candidate, paper 1 had at least qualifying numbers. immigration advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer