Find a Lawyer

AHMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE

Section 302/34 Judicial Justice System Ordinance (2000 of XXI), Sections 4 and 7 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Section 439 Review Trial Court dismisses the accused's request for trial under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance. The 2000 opinion was that the trial court had no jurisdiction to review the matter and to pass an unclean order in violation of sections 4 and 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 was charged with accuracy. Who filed the above petition before the trial court. Sessions Judge, who had no right to raise an objection in his jurisdiction in connection with the plea, the accused was dismissed by the trial court after dismissing his application, which otherwise I was rejected for good reasons. Outraged by the said order, the accused also filed a petition to move his case from the trial court. The other court of competent jurisdiction which led to the dismissal of the High Court by the High Court had filed a petition with the intention of delaying the trial, therefore, with a clear hand from the High Court. The reference was not made. Any unlawful and weak reviews were rejected in the circumstances top advocate from Swatmingora lawyer