MST. KHURSHID BEGUM versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Article 185 (3) of the petition for revision appeal was dismissed by the High Court on 15 11 2001 and against this order, the applicant preferred the review petition which was also rejected on Order 1515 2001 approved in the review. Was made and was not challenged directly before the Supreme Court. Instead, the order passed in the revision petition was challenged because the High Court had allowed the revision application on 15 11 2001 against which no petition for leave was allowed in the Supreme Court because it The applicant had demanded a revision of the order, having obtained the final status. The Supreme Court, which passed the central review without legal justification, refused to interfere with the High Court's ruling in exercising jurisdiction for review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Garh Maharaja lawyer
