Find a Lawyer

KHURSHID ALAM versus KHUSHI MUHAMMAD

After the provision of Article 19 Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the possession of property was registered by the parties and subsequently occupied. The defendants were given property in the dispute year 1963, the defendants were granted proprietary rights on 30 4 1977 and consequently the terms of the agreement were approved by the defendants in 5 7 1977, the trial was granted. The trial court also heard the case in favor of the plaintiffs, but the appellate court rejected the High Court's ban on the use of jurisdiction to amend, which upheld the decision passed by the trial court's plaintiff. Went and the plaintiff delayed the sale process at one excuse or another. The plaintiff's refusal to perform his part of the contract, in the circumstances, cannot be said about their rights and their claim was banned, especially when they were disposed of on behalf of the disputed land plaintiff. There was no report of a refusal to perform, so the defendant transferred the defendant under the agreement. Throughout the year 1963 all the defendant did not bring any substantial evidence to the record to prove that the defendant's possession was either illegal or was subject to any other conditions. Was free from legal malpractice guaranteed by the Supreme Court. The appeal was denied on leave Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kakur Town lawyer