MURTAZA HASEEB TEXTILE MILLS versus SITARA CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES
O XXXVII, R 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Conditional leave to defend suit, non-compliance with leave order, failure to present security, trial court granted defendant one month Directed the defendant to deposit the guarantee within the amount. Failure to comply with the order and the trial court had no choice but to uphold the judgment and order that the High Court upheld the trial court's decision and order in which the defendant contradicted the defendant. Was given enough time to comply rather than comply. , Plaintiff was inadvertently added to the litigation. Defendant's behavior, as determined by the trial court, was certainly controversial, and any illegal action by the High Court in dismissing the appeal by this decision, which was denied the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Lalamusa lawyer
