MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus THE STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Complainant did not enter into the witness box and presented the affidavit to the accused, Yet it cannot be trusted. As an affidavit when no other party was given an opportunity to examine it because of its lack of presence, otherwise, the entire machinery was transferred to the complainant who filed the complaint. And a raiding party was formed at the request of him who eventually raided the covered and seized money, the payment of Rs 1000 was without any doubt the basis of the prosecution witnesses which was against any of the accused. There was no enmity and those who explicitly disposed that the accused had demanded Rs. 2500 for the release of PT. 1 of which Rs 1000 was paid initially and the remaining amount was to be paid after Rs 1500.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khushab lawyer
