Article 199 Notification No 223 2010 118 CL (i) Constitutional Appeal 224 2010/119 CL (i) Constitutional Appeal Those who did not apply for leasehold auction on state land claimed to be leased from public land and that government Were paying their dues. The Department of Revenue regularly instructs, under a notification and policy issued by the Department, to pay unpaid rent with a lease increase of 15% and in case of default, the collector will have to resume the land and remove the lease. The option was, no notice was issued on the agreement. The leases and they themselves referred to the collectors, after which their requests were dismissed that the original auctioneer was not available in their records and as such they were illegal occupiers and their land included in the auction schedule. Was sought from the Revenue Officer. The Board of Revenue is stating that no record of individual sapphire is available in the Revenue Record and leases may be obtained. Finally and regularly, this request of the Revenue Officer is still pending. The parties agree before the High Court that the applicants will file petitions with the Revenue Officer for extension of their lease as per the scheme, and the Revenue Officers. We will examine such applications of applicants. In view of the fact that the land was not the fault of the applicants, it was not the fault of the applicants, but the Department of Revenue had a duty to preserve such records. After hearing the applicants, the applications were decided within one month. Will sign in. As per the law, the High Court further directed that the applicants be available
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
