Find a Lawyer

DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, NAROWAL versus MST. SAIRAN BIBI

The Applicant Court's order granting interim relief to the respondents for the hearing of the Su42 case, provided that the applicant's position was that the observations made under the appellate court's order were being damaged and that it was final. Will affect the merits of the applicant's case. Without any substance, the observations made by the appellate court were naturally temporary and were not based on any evidence. Such observations will not affect the merits of the case. The review was dismissed with the view that the trial court did not take into account the observations made in the appellate court's order and the record of its application and its application. The law will be decided strictly on the basis of evidence. r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• KEEBA v. BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB 2013 YLR 775
• AZAM KHAN NIAZI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Local Government 2013 MLD 775
• Mst. SALMA BIBI v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V) BOR/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 2013 CLC 776
• Dr. MUKHTIAR HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2013 MLD 778
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. Mst. NASREEN AKHTAR 2013 YLR 785
• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. State 2013 YLR 788
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 789
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN alias KHAN v. State 2013 MLD 798

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates contact from Sarai Alamgir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes