DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE versus MISS BISMAH ALI
OXVII, R3 Scope and OXVII, R3, CPC Appeal After adjournment of evidence, the trial court dismissed the trial, following the closure of evidence under OXVII, Rule 3, The CPC appeals court set aside such an order. The trial court and the remand of the case found that the provisions of the legal status of OXVII, Rule 3, CPC were inherently fine and that the trial court, for some parties, to attract such restraining order. Time must be given. For those who were required to present evidence, to cause their witnesses to attend or to perform any other action necessary to further the trial, this rule requires that the timely hearing be determined by the default party. The request must be made by a trial court. If the party order under which the order was required has been submitted, then the penal provisions of OXVII, Rule 3, CPC will not be applied against such party. Provided the last opportunity and said that the order was silent. Whether the plaintiff's evidence was present or not, on the date of the order, a request was made on the occasion of the plaintiff to provide the opportunity to appear or evidence and accordingly the final opportunity was granted by the adjournment. Was. The date of the deferred order on the evidence of the plaintiffs on which the evidence of the plaintiff was closed was not given, as was undoubtedly the provisions of O. XVII, Rule 3, CPC. Was given the last opportunity to produce evidence and that would not be sufficient to enforce the provisions of the sentence because the defendant's offer
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
