Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Section 2302 (a) (b) definition of evidence did not deny the incident, there was no dispute as to the date, time and place of the incident, on the evidence that the accused had confessed that he had fired the gun on the victim. There is evidence that the late period has expired. Due to his distress during the ocular account presented by the prosecution's witnesses, he could not be lightened, yet he was subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, confirming the statements of the prosecution's witnesses from the medical evidence. The parties were very closely related to each other and so was the accused. The confession to remain in the same house is the fact that the victim had advised the accused to quarrel with the family member of the accused for refusing to wash the accused's clothes at that moment, he picked up the gun and opened fire on the victim. It turned out that the fatal suspect was not. The victim was allegedly shot repeatedly, the moment thought was hot, the victim was left alone after the suspect was shot alone on the suspect with the fact that the accused was sufficiently punished. To a certain extent. The accused was sentenced to Section 302 (a), PPC to Section 302 (b), PPC and death sentence. The trial court reduced the accused to life imprisonment accordingly Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer