Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD IJAZ versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

O XLI, Rr 24 and 33 of the OZ Act (X of 1873), Failure to Appeal to Parts 8 and 12 Failed to present such persons on the due date for recording their statements, to which the Appellate Court applied. The nature of the proposed oath / affirmation proceeded to exclude the appeal and allowed respondents' appeal, in fact, it was asked if he would take the oath. The appellate court, together with any of the reasons assigned to the inquiry, denied it. Keeping the unwanted decisions / orders aside, the resultant appeals filed by the parties will be considered pending before the Appellate Court, who will make similar decisions on merit in the light of the evidence on record. famous high court advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer