Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus THE STATE

Except for sections 13A, 14, 15E and 37 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), section 199A of the Article 199 Constitutional Application Laws Act, 1924, the formation of a diverse board, extending the term of the diverse board The subsequent notification, which eventually expired on 5 11 2002, at the end of this term, denied the appointment of a special board meeting in terms of section 37 (2) of the Act, the petitioners said. Creating a diverse board was unquestionable. And that at the expiration of that period, the boards formed under Section 13A of the Act were automatically restored. The legal authority has chosen to act under Section 14 (1) (b) of the Act. ? For the administration of the cantonment, the diversification board was required, nothing was brought on record in such notification to show how satisfied the government was that such extraordinary measures were required so that the High Court could Be able to tell if the government is satisfied with Touchstone. The standards set by the Supreme Court in the case of Syed Saeed Hassan (PLD 1976 SC6), after the current board suffered from administrative problems, constitute another board as a delimitation process for the controversial board. There was no reason and after that the election was finalized. According to Section 15E of the Act itself, even if the terms of the members expire, they will continue to operate under Section 13A (5) of the Act, until the election or the nomination of their successor is granted by the Constitutional petition. , Announced the notification to the Diversified Board and extended its term without any legal authority and kept it separate, resulting immigration advocate from Quaidabad lawyer