Find a Lawyer

WASEEM ALIAS BUTT versus THE STATE

Although the testimony of Section 2 (2 (b)) was appreciated overnight, it is mentioned in the FIR itself that electric lights were available to facilitate witnesses to identify the culprits. In which the FIR was reasonably prompt and charged with the accused - especially the culprit who had shot the complainant - it was a natural witness because The incident happened in the street outside his house and at a time when his house was expected to be under normal circumstances, though it was a witness to the occasion. He lived about a mile away, but gave a specific reason for his presence at the scene and said that the suspects were not seriously questioned during the cross-examination. There were brothers and sisters, but the mere relationship of a witness with the deceased does not automatically disqualify the witness from being a complaining and credible witness. Both said that witnesses had no hostility or enmity of this nature against the accused. Not to imply that he is falsely implicated in a case of this kind relating to the murder of his brother. Both said that witnesses made permanent statements to the trial court about the main incident, which was faith-inspiring and had impressed the trial court on statements from eyewitnesses regarding the culpability of the accused by the prosecution. There was no reason to be completely dependent. After the incident, the accused was absconding for one year; medical evidence produced by the prosecution also helped the ocular account. tax advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer