Find a Lawyer

MESSRS MAHMOOD BROTHERS versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

Sections 12, 9 (3) and 10 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), OV, R 17 Summons on the alleged refusal by the Respondents of the OV to suite the defendant's suit for debt collection, R 17, CPC Scope Banking Court issued the summons to the defendants and directed that the summons be submitted by the summons process server. Courier service and publications registered through the Post Confession Courier Service and English daily and the English case and the case was adjourned to a later date when it was discovered that the court adjourned the case after filing a petition for leave to defend the case. No, a former party decree against the defendants was approved, and the processor server, which appeared on the back of the summons, shows that none of the defendants on the action server were summoned, This shows that although the defendants were present, they refused to receive the summons and thus The nails pasted the salmon. At the address given. The notice was not seen by anyone in the area and the processor server did not give an affidavit in support of the bankruptcy court's denial of the report, stating that the processor server had taken the oath before the oath. Was. Nazir said, but it is unclear what facts the processor server showed before the allegation of the processor server was not in accordance with the law because the court did not have a competent judicial officer before it could swear. Prior to the proceedings, administered under the law banking court, the former party did not satisfy itself that in fact the defendants had deliberately supplied the OV, R 17 law firms from Charsada lawyer