The provisions of Sections 302 (b) and 460 Qatil-e-Azam, evidence of tampering with the houses overnight, were filed immediately without any delay, and the accused had no active role in the complainant's supplementary statement. Was declared, and the prosecution's witness did not play any active role. At the time of the presence of the accused and the incident and the prosecution's witnesses regarding their role had improved their statements and stated that the witnesses were not mentioned in the FIR 16 days of enrollment in the murder investigation report. The evidence produced by the FIR prosecution later shows that the accused was involved in the case because of improvements made by the complainant, and other eyewitnesses followed the same line. And also involved dishonest reforms made by prosecution witnesses regarding the presence of the accused. Although the witnesses at the scene of the incident and their role played the prosecution, most of the prosecution witnesses had no enmity with the accused, but their statements were not charged with the accused and they were not affected by the trust. While they would cause the absence of enmity with the accused, it did not mean that the death penalty would have been possible if the accused wanted to remain intact without immediately examining the evidence of the evidence of such witnesses. Complainant's additional statement would not be equivalent to an FIR incident was a nightly event, but an FIR The sources of light were not mentioned in the complaint by the complainant in his supplementary statement and by the testimony of the other prosecution.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
