A VII R 11 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), retaining a series of proceedings in the presence of an arbitration agreement between the 34 parties, the plaintiff's suit for restitution dismissed the plaintiff under Order VII, R 11, CPC. Was subsequently filed and the application was made for processing of the application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, under section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 on the ground that the application was rejected. After applying under Rule 11, the defendant cannot request to remain on the defendant. Legal action under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, to decide whether an act constituted a step in the proceeding, whether a summons was heard in court or orally applied and this Act This indicates that the party is accepting. Taking the other side of the decision to dispose of the dispute, the law intended that the defendant wanted to take advantage of the arbitration clause, essentially without any advertisement, and before submitting to the jurisdiction of the court. Inform the court in vague terms that it is going to insist on the implementation of the arbitration clause. Defendants will exclude themselves from the protection of Section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 if they do not have such a position before filing a written statement. And such a situation is no different. If he took steps in the proceedings before raising any objection, the plaintiff had taken action in the proceedings before moving the application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 and hence the trial court upheld his application for stay in the proceedings. Was rejected as
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
