The complimentary delay of four days in filing the FIR of section 2 302 (b) of the evidence was established on the basis of which the case was registered after deliberation and consultation. Had failed to prove the cause of the incident against his father. The victim was not found on the spot at the time of the incident, or he would have reported it to the police immediately; late the FIR had advised that the complainant had received the incident after the victim was killed. Was told about. Moved to the hospital, the complainant's evidence was therefore not reliable; other witnesses alleged that the accused had committed the crime at the behest of the complaining party, all the injuries were on the victim's legs and his medical in the injured. According to the legal report. In any case, none of the injured was declared life-threatening, and although he remained conscious during that period, the death was not recorded by the investigating officer, Post-mortem examination of the deceased was not performed following the death of the victim himself. It cannot be ascertained that the gun was recoverable by chance, in the absence of a forensic science laboratory report, because of any vacancy, and could not be used against the accused. He was acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
