MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT (DEFUNCT KMC)
Articles 199 of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 constitutionally included the question of retaining the original aspect during legal proceedings in the High Court, whether the respondents have a request that the court seize the applicant's court It was decided to demolish the construction on the plot. In order to maintain stability and dispose of them, they have the advantage of presenting evidence to the Commission that the interim relief sought by the applicant to prevent the recording of the evidence on the Commission, was approved by the High Court in the original jurisdiction. There will be money to suspend the order under which the applicant was not protected by the trial court. For the benefit of the parties, the nature of the dispute, but wanted to extend the construction before the dispute was raised iii The applicant lacked such superiority before the suit could be resolved. The High Court could not grant the constitutional application within the limits and spent Rs. 5000
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Jamrud Road lawyer