Find a Lawyer

MST. NADIA versus THE STATE

The termination of proceedings of Section 1 561 Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (I, 1979, VII), Sections 13, 14 and 18 against the applicant / accused was merely evidence that she was going with someone who was allegedly involved. Was involved in the prostitution business and police said the man had confessed to police that he was taking an applicant to supply to a customer, which he readily saw in the company's company. Went, he could not eliminate the notion of innocence of the applicants if it is said that the police had taken some admission before engaging the police. There was no admissible evidence under the law that if the applicant was not proven to be a virgin as a result of a medical checkup, he himself could not be used as evidence to prove his conviction in this case. There is no possibility of applicant punishment. The applicant was, in the circumstances, liable to terminate it due to misuse of the law. best law firm from Panjan Kisan lawyer