MUKHTAR AHMED versus IIIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 15 (2) (iv) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of removal of tenants due to the applicants for material cost or malfunction of its utility is available only to the landlord because the shops in question The blame for the price cut was to be accumulated. To his lawyer's effect that the walls between the shops in question were removed by the tenants, the witness admitted in cross-examination that he never knew when the walls were removed, but when he visited the shops. So he found them. Attorney Borden was appointed to prove a material malfunction in the premises, it was up to the landlords, but in this case it was not established by the landlord that the effect of removing the dividing walls in question only had its effect. Will have to spoil. Shops in FAQ
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Islamabad lawyer
