DR. SYED MUHAMMAD KHALID MOIN versus THE STATE
Abductors by definition of evidence in Section 365 A / 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 (2) (c) and 7 (ii) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) The prosecution case was fully supported. Telling details of the incident from the time of his abduction to his release, who saw the suspect during his abduction and detention, before the magistrate bank employees identified the suspect, who surrounded the check. Taken, the prosecution's witnesses had no reason to be falsely implicated in the crime, and their testimony affected the conviction, and serious evidence of their recovery from the accused was also linked to the commission of the crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Gadoon Amazai lawyer
