Find a Lawyer

LAIQ SHAH versus THE STATE

The accused was apprehended by the complaining party under section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), section 395 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), section 13D bail. His partner was released after threatening him. Three other cases were pending against the complaining party. Although the accused complainant and the prosecution witness did not identify the accused under Section 13D of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, that would not mean that they too We will not exclude the accused in the case against him. Section 95 95, the PPCFIR was signed by the complainant but he withdrew its contents and could thus be prosecuted for the accused involved in a hateful case of robbery which Covered by a prohibited clause of section 497 (1), CRPC cash recovered recovered, 000,000 recovered from the possession of the accused and there was ocular evidence as the FIR contents against it were available. No action was yet to be taken in the matter. rve guarantee jobs for advocates from Renala Khurd lawyer