Find a Lawyer

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Definitions of Articles 9 (c), 20 and 21 were not prepared for the location of the incident where the possession of the narcotics recovery site was not established in which the contents of the drug bag were opened. I found the prosecution's evidence inconsistent in the content description. Through the trial court, for which the investigating officer had no explanation available for violation of section 20 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, the investigating officer had no option to exercise discretion under section 21 of the said act. Was not justified. And the conviction of the accused was not lasting in terms of fact and law and accordingly they were separated. power of attorney advocate Bajaur lawyer